As the economic and political landscape shifts under Trump’s latest administration, a pattern of destabilization emerges—one that appears intentional and strategically crafted. With tariffs now officially imposed on major trade partners, the systematic elimination of diversity and equity initiatives, and mass deportations disrupting key industries, the American economy stands on the brink of a self-inflicted crisis. Meanwhile, some of the most powerful figures in the tech industry—Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, and others—have aligned themselves with Trump despite the inevitable economic fallout that will harm consumer spending and digital advertising, the lifeblood of their business empires.
The central question is: Why would they support policies that could cause their companies to lose money?
The newly implemented tariffs—25% on imports from Canada and Mexico and 10% on imports from China—are an indirect but devastating tax on American consumers. Despite being framed as a move to protect domestic industries, history shows that tariffs drive up prices for everyday goods—food, fuel, and electronics—hitting lower- and middle-income families the hardest. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), tariffs imposed between 2018 and 2020 reduced the average real household income by approximately $1,277 per year. Additionally, Yale University’s Budget Lab estimated that the tariffs signed by Trump on February 1, 2025, could cost American households between $1,000 and $1,200 annually. With Canada and Mexico imposing retaliatory tariffs, the financial burden is now projected to exceed $3,000 per household per year, exacerbating financial strain and deepening wealth inequality.
Economic analysts predict that these tariffs will further increase inflationary pressures in the United States, making essential goods and services more expensive. Historically, economic recessions trigger unemployment spikes, inflationary pressure, and reduced consumer spending. When people have less money, they buy fewer products, and companies slash advertising budgets—directly harming ad-revenue-dependent platforms like Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), and TikTok. Economists from the Tax Foundation have warned that increased costs from tariffs will likely force corporations to implement mass layoffs and early retirement buyouts while simultaneously cutting wages.
Further destabilizing the economy, key trade partners—Canada, Mexico, and China—have implemented retaliatory tariffs, undercutting U.S. industries that depend on exports. China has announced plans to challenge the U.S. tariffs through the World Trade Organization and is preparing further countermeasures. If the trade war escalates, the financial burden on American households could exceed $3,500 annually, exacerbating economic precarity.
One possibility is that these billionaires are not making a short-term economic calculation but rather a long-term strategic investment—not in money, but in power.
Elon Musk’s nearly $300 million campaign investment into Trump’s re-election was not just political support—it was a transaction. By backing Trump, Musk and other tech billionaires secured deregulation, weakened antitrust enforcement, and gained unrestricted access to government contracts. Musk’s growing empire—from Tesla and SpaceX to X and AI ventures—grants him control over vast amounts of consumer and financial data, raising concerns that he is leveraging his relationship with Trump to consolidate power beyond business into governance itself.
Musk’s influence now extends beyond mere business interests. He has been appointed to lead the newly established Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an advisory group tasked with reducing federal spending through workforce reductions and budget cuts. This position grants Musk significant influence over federal agencies, including those that oversee sectors in which he has substantial business interests.
The implications of Musk’s unchecked data accumulation are staggering. With access to social media data, artificial intelligence, and financial transactions through X and other platforms, Musk can track not just economic activity but also political dissent. A billionaire with this much power funding a government that is actively dismantling democratic safeguards presents a direct threat to political transparency and fair governance. Musk is not simply a corporate ally of Trump—he is a key player in the remaking of a government that serves private interests over public welfare.
If the economy collapses under the weight of Trump’s policies, the ultra-rich will not suffer the same way as the average citizen. They stand to gain. Economic turmoil could allow for:
• Mass acquisitions of failing companies at bargain prices
• The destruction of small business competition
• A workforce desperate enough to accept lower wages and fewer rights
This approach mirrors Russia’s use of “political technology” to manipulate elections and consolidate oligarchic control. In post-Soviet Russia, oligarchs used economic crises to buy up state assets at bargain prices while simultaneously using media disinformation to maintain control. The same playbook is now unfolding in the United States.
Trump’s economic collapse is not just an accident—it is setting the stage for mass privatization of public services. Elon Musk has already suggested privatizing Amtrak and the U.S. Postal Service, while deep cuts to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) indicate that weather services could also be sold off to private entities. The Trump administration has announced plans to cut 80,000 jobs from the Department of Veterans Affairs, which Senator Tammy Duckworth warns is an attempt to gut the agency before pushing for full privatization.
By deliberately underfunding and dismantling public institutions, Trump and his allies are engineering a system where private corporations step in to take over essential services—for profit.
Trump is not leading a populist movement—he is executing a well-funded operation designed to reshape the U.S. into a government where economic collapse, regulatory capture, and authoritarian entrenchment work together to ensure that the ruling elite remains permanently in power.
The U.S. now faces a defining moment: If Trump and elites continue to trend in this direction, we all need to collectively decide. Will we allow an orchestrated economic collapse to cement the rule of a corporate elite, or will we recognize the warning signs and resist this consolidation of power?
If we fail to recognize this strategy for what it is—an engineered crisis designed to justify authoritarian rule—the consequences will extend far beyond one election cycle. Once economic collapse is used as a pretext to erode democratic norms, those lost freedoms will not be easily restored. History shows that authoritarian regimes consolidate power by manufacturing crises and positioning themselves as the only solution.
If Americans do not mobilize now, the country may not just face a temporary economic downturn but a permanent restructuring of governance, where elections become performative, the opposition is silenced, and economic precarity ensures a population too burdened to resist.
The longer economic instability is used as a tool to justify power consolidation, the harder it will be to reverse. Americans must mobilize—not just at the ballot box, but in grassroots organizing, economic resistance, and legal challenges—to prevent a deliberate march toward plutocracy.
The future of democracy depends on it.
CRESCENT MAGAZINE © 2025
